17
The road to hell
Sahibzada Raoof Ali, while talking to me one evening in late 1976, predicted that new elections would be held shortly.
“How come, sir?” I asked him. “There are still about two years to go before elections will be due. Why should Bhutto Sahib bring it forward?”
“To satisfy the Americans,” he replied.
During at a meeting on narcotics, a senior U.S. delegate had told Sahibzada Sahib that President-elect Jimmy Carter had decided that American aid in future would be given only to the genuinely elected governments in the Third World because backing the dictators there had made America unpopular among their people. Sahibzada thought that Bhutto was quite shrewd and would like to get a fresh mandate before he dealt with the new American administration.
In those days, I was not in the mainstream of the general administration but did hear about many misdeeds of the Bhutto government. Punjab was seething with resentment and despondency under the oppression of a ruthless administration. The people were losing faith in the due process of law. Some friends of Mustafa Khar had been taken to Dulai Camp in Azad Kashmir and were being tortured there without even admitting that they were in custody. Writ petitions were filed in the Lahore High Court for their release but Azad Kashmir, where the camp was located, was out of its jurisdiction. In public perception, Bhutto was responsible for the murder of Nawab Muhammad Ahmad Khan. (He was later tried on this charge and was ultimately hanged. More about it in the next chapter.) Hanif Ramay had been dismissed and sent from the Chief Minister House to the infamous interrogation center in the Lahore Fort for pleading in his book, “The Case of the Punjab,” a fair deal for the largest province. Raja Munawwar and many of Ramay’s other friends had joined the Muslim League. Nawab Sadiq Husain Qureshi, considered to be only a stooge of Bhutto and without any following of his own, had become the Chief Minister. Jama’at-i-Islami, Tehrik-i-Istiqlal and Pakistan Democratic Party, under their respective leaders, Mian Tufail Muhammad, Asghar Khan and Nawabzada Nasrulla, were very active in mobilizing the public opinion against the oppressive government.
In the Punjab, there were frequent bomb blasts, for which the government blamed the National Awami Party and its leader, Wali Khan, but the people pointed their fingers towards Bhutto and his Federal Security Force. An ASI of FSF in plain clothes was caught red-handed by passengers at the Lahore railway station while planting a bomb in the bathroom of the compartment in which Air Marshal Asghar Khan was traveling so that a case could be made against him and his party. The ASI was saved by the Railway Police from being lynched by the public but in the process he blurted out his identity. The press had been gagged and even an incident like that could not find any mention. The news, as it happens in such conditions, traveled far and wide by word of mouth.
There was turmoil elsewhere also. NWFP was already afire with Wali Khan and other NAP leaders facing their trial for treason before a tribunal in Hyderabad. Balochistan had been trampled by army action since long and most of the leaders there had fled to Afghanistan. Even situation in Sindh, the home province of Bhutto, was not calm. There were disturbing reports from Karachi.
There was fear all around. The administration, thoroughly unnerved, had become totally subservient and was willing to carry out all orders, right or wrong, of the rulers. I could see a strong storm coming but most public servants thought everything was under tight control. The Intelligence Bureau, Inter Services Intelligence, Special Branches of the provinces and the district administrations were describing the situation as “most ideal.” Such assessments could not be made after what had been done to the people unless the officers were totally oblivious of the situation on the ground. So I could not agree with colleagues in the intelligence agencies, who would repeat the same views to me also. Only a politician with insight can make a realistic assessment of the political situation, not an obsequious bureaucrat, whose mind works in a totally different way. A bureaucrat will always be indifferent, if not hostile, to public feelings. It will take an extraordinary effort for him to have empathy and identity with public feelings and reach the right conclusions. So, I have always been suspicious of the bureaucratic assessments of public opinion on politics and social issues.
By then Bhutto had been surrounded by those who urged “strong administrative approach,” which would cause only alienation of the people. The so-called strong and shrewd administrators like Saeed Ahmad Khan, Waqar Ahmad, Masood Mahmood, Wakil Khan and their ilk had already taken Bhutto on the dark path of illegality and criminality to a point of no return.
Bureaucrats have their way. My friend, Tikka Muhammad Iqbal Khan, an intelligent, well-informed and sagacious politician, was close to Bhutto. He asked me for my assessment several times and I explained to him the risks in holding elections. I pointed out the loss of Bhutto charisma, that had been caused by high-handedness and foolishness of his so-called strong administrators. He agreed with me generally but said that the assessments of all intelligence agencies and senior officers about elections were totally different from mine. He could not persuade Bhutto to change his mind and the bureaucrats had the last word. The general elections to the National and Provincial Assemblies were announced to be held on March 7 and 10, 1977, respectively. Carried away by the possibility of a dazzling display of popularity, Bhutto had gambled his political career on the assessments of a few bureaucrats, who had no awareness of the public mood and political dynamics and probably were also not loyal to him.
Immediately after the announcement of elections, nine opposition parties joined to form the Pakistan National Alliance (PNA), something Bhutto had been told was not likely. It was a severe blow to Bhutto’s hopes for a two-thirds majority but now it was too late to do anything except to concentrate on the election campaign and administrative manipulations. Bhutto based his appeal to the people on his achievements in foreign affairs. He had recovered occupied territory as well as POWs without conceding anything to India. There were no war trials and no division of assets with Bangladesh. Then he had really put the scattered pieces together and built up the morale of the people and the army. He also gave the country a consensus constitution. He genuinely felt proud of his achievements, little realizing that he had squandered away everything by riding roughshod in matters of internal administration. He forgot that oppressive measures had not helped Yahya Khan even under martial law. How could such methods help a politician, whose authority depended entirely on the goodwill of the people?
As the election campaign picked up, PNA was dominating while PPP appeared to be on the run. The PNA played on the theme of inhuman treatment and tyranny by Bhutto against his political adversaries and attracted tremendous public response. The religious parties in the PNA mobilized their committed and diehard workers. Bhutto also committed a serious blunder by getting himself elected unopposed from Larkana. To prevent him from filing his nomination papers in time, the abduction of his opponent, Maulana Jan Muhammad Abbasi, of Jama’at-i-Islami, was arranged, allegedly by Khalid Kharal, Deputy Commissioner (later Information Minister in Benazir’s second government). All Chief Ministers followed the example set by their leader and got themselves elected unopposed. Thus a lingering doubt was cast over the whole election process right from the beginning.
In that suspicious and charged atmosphere, the elections to the National Assembly were held on March 7. The people showed great enthusiasm and participated in large numbers. Most people believed that PNA had won but the results next day gave a landslide victory to the PPP. There was a widespread rejection of the results and the PNA leadership announced the boycott of the provincial elections scheduled for March 10.
I saw the roads deserted on March 8 as I traveled from Rawalpindi to Lahore by road. The people appeared to be in a state of shock as if they had been betrayed and robbed. The deadly silence spoke volumes and could be the precursor of a big storm. The boycott of elections to the Provincial Assemblies on March 10 was complete because the polling stations had been deserted and very few voters turned up. Still, the official results showed “heavy turn-out.” That claim washed away whatever was left of the credibility of the elections. Thus, any remaining doubts about the allegations of rigging in the National Assembly elections were also gone.
Beginning of the end. It did not take long for the Pakistan National Alliance to give momentum to its agitation against Bhutto. It soon organized itself into a movement, with highly motivated wings for students, women, lawyers and labour. A large procession, led by Asghar Khan, was taken out in Lahore from Nila Gumbad, near Anarkali Bazaar. Then processions started coming out everywhere despite unprecedented repression by the government machinery. The campaign picked up in intensity, volume and scope throughout the country while the administration tried to crush it ruthlessly with lathi-charge, tear gas and at places even with firing that caused many casualties. Frequent general strikes paralyzed business and industry. There was violence all around, with the protesters often indulging in arson and looting. The fact was that those who had sown the wind of violence and illegalities were now reaping the whirlwind. The people who had been suppressed so long were now up in arms.
The PPP as a party was not visible and the situation was being handled by the government machinery only as a law and order issue. There were increased attacks on the PPP offices, its important leaders and their properties. In Lahore, Ratan Cinema and a hotel on McLeod Road, both belonging to PPP stalwarts, were burnt, along with some persons inside. Great fear was created among the PPP leaders and workers and many started leaving their residences. The religious leaders introduced a very attractive slogan, Nizam-i-Mustafa (the administrative system of the Holy Prophet), and the movement, already considered “a jihad against an oppressive un-Islamic government,” took a new dimension.
The worst came on April 9, when the newly elected Punjab Provincial Assembly was to meet in Lahore. The whole city appeared to be protesting. No government-owned public bus could move on the roads and any that did was burnt. Many processions were converging on the Assembly chambers. IGP Ch. Fazl-i-Haq was himself on the spot. The lower echelons became nervous because of his presence and went awry, committing serious errors of judgment. The police stopped the processions on various roads leading to the Assembly chambers, resulting in many deaths and injuries by police firing. There was arson and looting all day long.
The way a procession of women was handled near the Civil Lines police station will always be a black mark on PPP. A day earlier, a large number of prostitutes were recruited as temporary policewomen, ironically by a police officer who is now a Haji and claims to be very religious. They were provided hurriedly sewn uniforms and were asked to remain ready in the police station. (They came to be known as “the Nath Force,” because nath, a circular ornament worn by women at the nose end, has a special significance for prostitutes. When a virgin prostitute is deflowered after a kind of auction held at a special function by her guardians, the ceremony is called “removal of the nath.”) The Nath Force pounced upon the women in the procession, abused them in filthiest possible language, manhandled them, even tore their clothes. This incident, one of the most quoted, caused great revulsion among the people, whose social norms demand decent treatment to women even in the worst conditions.
Bhutto was in Lahore and monitored the operations himself. He must have realized the gravity of the situation after watching the mood of the people. The same evening he called on Maulana Maudoodi, head of Jama’at-i-Islami, at his home in Ichhra to seek his support in calming the masses but it was already too late. Moreover, the PNA was not Maudoodi’s Jama’at alone. It had eight other parties, with units to the lowest levels, which carried on the movement even after the major leaders were arrested.
The PNA had 31 demands, with resignation of Bhutto being at the top. Bhutto tried surreptitiously to win over Rafiq Bajwa, the Secretary General of PNA, who became a pariah the moment people came to know that he had secretly met the Prime Minister in Rawalpindi, having flown from Lahore under a pseudonym. The time for tricks was over.
Tikka Iqbal, an advisor to the Punjab Governor Sadiq Husain Qureshi, would visit me frequently to discuss the situation. I would tell him that the only way out was conciliation instead of confrontation, dialogue rather than danda. He would agree with me but say that Bhutto had been surrounded by hawks, who had made it an ego issue for him. Bhutto himself was not prepared to believe that “a group of pigmies” could outdo him in politics. He considered it beneath his position to have dialogue with people like Nasrulla Khan, Mufti Mahmood, Asghar Khan, Wali Khan and others. Both sides were locked in a no-win situation. Bhutto wanted to crush PNA while PNA was determined to bring him down.
Danda, not dialogue. In that atmosphere of deathly deadlock, a friend, Mian Ahmad Ali, told me that he had met Nasrulla Khan and Hamza in the PNA office and they were sure of their ultimate success.
“I don’t think they can succeed,” I observed. “In my assessment, Bhutto will fight to the end. In the process, the system may fail and democracy will be the casualty.”
“What is the way out, then?” he asked.
“I don’t know. But I think a face-saving way out has to be given to Bhutto. He too is trapped.”
“How can it be done?”
“PNA cannot negotiate a way out unless it is prepared to drop the demand for Bhutto’s resignation,” I replied. “Don’t expect him to commit political suicide. If the demand for resignation is dropped, a compromise can become easy.”
I was expressing my opinion only on his asking but Mian Ahmad Ali went to Nasrulla Khan, who according to him, was quite amenable to the idea and had said that the demand for resignation was only a pressure tactic. Mian believed that sincere moves for a settlement were likely to be welcome by PNA. He asked me to intervene.
“How can I?” I observed. “I am not a politician.”
While we were talking, Tikka Iqbal dropped in and joined our discussion. The consensus was that negotiations should take place to find a way out and the demand for Bhutto’s resignation should be dropped. Tikka Iqbal pursued the idea with Bhutto.
The next day, April 23, Nasrulla Khan was also arrested, to the utter disappointment of Ahmad Ali, but the idea had been floated. In the first week of May, Muhammad Arshad Chaudhri, a senior leader of Nasrulla’s Pakistan Democratic Party, told me that negotiations between the PNA and Bhutto had been arranged through the mediation of Saudi Arabian Ambassador, Riaz al-Khatib, and were taking place in the Police College, Sihala. But somehow the negotiations broke down after only a few days and all PNA leaders were sent to far-off jails.
The agitation was continued by the next tier of leadership and gained so much intensity that the army had to be called in several cities. Even the army was resisted and people came forward to lay down their lives. A few senior army officers refused to order firing on the protesting crowds during the limited martial law imposed in three big cities. The martial law was, however, declared unconstitutional by Lahore and Sindh High Courts. The chiefs of army, navy and air force, in a very unusual move, expressed public support for the constitutional government by appearing on television but the people were not impressed and the agitation did not abate. Asghar Khan, a retired air force chief, wrote an open letter to the armed forces, urging them to do their constitutional duty by removing an illegitimate government that had violated the constitution blatantly.
On the other side, Bhutto went into the bazaars of Rawalpindi, waving a letter of the U.S. Secretary of State and describing the whole agitation as a part of the U.S.-sponsored grand design against him. It did not cut much ice.
I happened to meet the President, Ch. Fazal Elahi in May while I was in Rawalpindi for a meeting. Even a man of his insight thought that the situation could be controlled by sufficient military force, as was done in 1953 in Lahore during the anti-Ahmadiya agitation. “Sir, 1977 is not like 1953 and the issue has a much wider appeal,” I told him. He did not agree with me when I mentioned the need for a meaningful dialogue.
Some desperate measures were being taken. Mustafa Khar rejoined the PPP and became a Special Assistant to the Prime Minister. Bhutto seemed to have reconciled with him to extricate himself from the Dulai camp mess. Rao Rashid was posted as the DIB in those very days in place of Sh. Muhammad Akram. Still wise counsel was not prevailing. Tikka Iqbal appeared dismayed. He told me, “Anybody suggesting a political way out is dubbed by the hawks in the chambers of power as disloyal, traitor and an enemy of Bhutto.”
Unscheduled entry in the act. While in Islamabad for an official meeting on treatment and rehabilitation of drug addicts, I went to see my friend Arshad Chaudhri at his home on June 3. A large number of IB and SB staff outside it created an eerie atmosphere. I did not know what was happening inside. I entered the house in my usual manner and found Pir Pagara, Nawabzada Nasrulla Khan, Mufti Mahmood and Prof. Ghafoor in the drawing room. Prof. Ghafoor was giving an interview to a BBC correspondent. The leaders were as surprised to see me as I was to see them. I had most innocently and unwittingly walked on to the stage of the political drama while it was at its climax. I immediately realized the gravity of my mistake and left the house with the profoundest apologies. It occurred to me that they might suspect me for spying on them on behalf of the Government. That would make me look dishonourable in their eyes. But then I thought that they were intelligent people and would understand that such things were never done in that naive manner.
I had hardly reached my room in the Government Hostel when I got a call from Naseeb Butt, Personal Assistant to SP, Special Branch, Rawalpindi, who had served with me also. He told me that my visit to the house of Arshad Chaudhri had been reported immediately. He knew that Arshad Chaudhri was an old friend of mine but was afraid that the visit would be definitely misunderstood. I was really worried because Waqar Ahmad, Secretary Establishment, was very quick in taking summary action on the smallest lapse of a government officer.
I went to see DIB Rao Rashid the same evening and told him about my visit to the house of Arshad Chaudhri. I had served with him while he was IGP Punjab. He was delighted to know about the incident and wanted me to collect information on what was going on in that house. He told me that serious negotiations between Bhutto and PNA had been arranged and the leaders had been brought to Islamabad for that purpose. Rao Rashid told me that he sincerely wanted the negotiations to succeed and I believed him because he was an honourable man.
I had really landed myself in a strange and a difficult situation. I ruminated over the matter and then went to Arshad Chaudhri and told him of my conversation with Rao Rashid. I was in a moral conflict as I did not want to behave dishonourably towards any party. He discussed the matter with Nasrulla Khan and later told me that I was welcome any time into his house because the PNA leaders had nothing to hide. In fact, they would prefer that truth should reach Bhutto through a channel of his own choice instead of conjectures that could vitiate the whole process.
I told Rao Rashid that I had discussed everything with Arshad Chaudhri. “He says even Rao Sahib himself is welcome to listen to our deliberations,” I said. “Their only concern is that they may not be cheated. Their ultimate objective is to have free and fair elections to the National and Provincial Assemblies.”
Bhutto drags his feet. During the negotiations, Bhutto was assisted by Maulana Kausar Niazi and Hafiz Peerzada while Mufti Mahmood, the President of PNA, was assisted by Nasrulla Khan and Prof. Ghafoor. Both teams worked hard over a long and difficult agenda. The PNA wanted the issues to be resolved in the shortest possible time so that it could go for re-elections while Bhutto wanted to drag the negotiations so that the agitation cooled off. Bhutto wanted to prolong not only the negotiations but even the re-elections if ultimately agreed to. While the negotiations were going on, he left on a tour of several Muslim countries to give an impression that he was taking things easy and there was nothing seriously wrong at home. But the time for tricks had passed. Now truth had to triumph, as Arshad Chaudhri always said.
On the streets, another kind of confrontation was being built up. Mustafa Khar was belatedly organizing the PPP workers in the Punjab to come out and display “the popularity of PPP and Bhutto.” It was a dangerous game and created the specter of a civil war. The concern of the army became known both to Rao Rashid and PNA.
The parleys were resumed on the return of Bhutto but this round started in a more vitiated atmosphere. PNA leaders wanted to fix a deadline for an accord or they would step up the movement and be ready to go to jail again.
The negotiating team used to brief the PNA Council on the progress of talks and get briefing for the next session. In one such meeting, they decided that everyone should get his clothes washed on double rate (for express delivery) so that they did not go to jail while waiting for clean clothes from the laundry. Rao Rashid informed Bhutto about it and he in turn mentioned it to the negotiating team to impress them with his ability to know all about them.
Zia brings darkness. Around June 26, I came to know that secret preparations were being made for the imposition of martial law. Rao Rashid was upset when I told him about it.
“You have brought bad news,” he commented.
“Bad but true,” I said. “Only four generals are not in favour of martial law, according to my information. All others are for it because they think there will be civil war after the breakdown of negotiations. The PPP workers will come out against the PNA workers and there will be a blood bath. The generals also believe that there is a plan to kill all PNA leaders.”
“Somebody is painting a wrong picture to prejudice the generals,” he said.
“May be but Bhutto Sahib should clinch the issue with maximum speed instead of moving at a snail’s pace. I am certain about the need for urgency. If the negotiations are finalized in time, the danger to democracy will be over.” He agreed with me.
“What will be the likely outcome in case of re-elections?” he asked.
“PPP is likely to get a comfortable majority at least in the Punjab.” I gave him my assessment.
The next day Arshad Chaudhri came to know independently that martial law was imminent. “Something should be done to stop it,” he suggested.
“The only thing that can do it is the immediate finalization of the accord,” I told him.
I again went to Rao Rashid to tell him what Arshad Chaudhri had learnt through his own independent source.
“Bhutto does not believe it,” Rao Rashid told me. “He thinks it is a PNA pressure tactic.”
“Even then there is no harm in finalizing the matter immediately,” I said.
I suggested that the parleys might be held continuously and nobody should be allowed to get up until an accord was reached. The PNA and PPP teams did hold the parleys the whole night on June 28 and reached an accord.
“They followed your advice literally,” Rao Rashid told me the next day. “Your name will go down in history.”
I smiled and thanked him. “I’ll be very happy even if I am mentioned in a footnote.”
The next day I met Mustafa Khar in the Prime Minister House and told him that martial law would come if the accord was not made public immediately. He did not believe me.
“If martial law was to be imposed, the best time was 9th April,” he said. “There is no chance of martial law now. Earlier the PPP workers were demoralized. Now they have somebody to look up to.” His tone showed great confidence.
“Well, sir, I have given you the information,” I said. “You can still avert it.” I passed on the information to Maj. Gen. Imtiaz, Military Secretary to Prime Minister, and also to Ch. Anwar Aziz, my friend and a very shrewd politician, but both did not like to believe it.
After an agreement had been reached on June 28, the PNA team had to face great opposition in their Council. Air Marshal Asghar Khan was talking tough. The accord provided for fresh elections in three months, on October 18 to be exact, under the supervision of a supreme council, composed of equal number of members from the Government and the opposition. Air Marshall demanded that the accord should become a part of the Constitution and be enforceable through the Supreme Court. He took Nasrulla Khan aside and told him that he would get the new elections from the army within three months but Bhutto could not be relied upon to be fair during re-elections and might even resile from his commitment after the agitation cooled off. On the insistence of Air Marshal, the venue for further PNA Council meetings was shifted to the house of Col. Tasaddaq, of Tehrik-i-Istiqlal, instead of the home of Arshad Chaudhri. I smelled a rat.
I told Rao Rashid about the thinking of Air Marshal Asghar Khan. Bhutto was pleased that there were serious differences within the PNA. He was trying to catch on a straw.
“Bhutto is satisfied that the army will not interfere,” he told me. “It has been checked for him by Gen. Tikka Khan. It is difficult to press the point any further.” Rao was showing helplessness.
The PNA, under pressure from Asghar Khan, continued to insist that the accord should be a part of the constitution while Bhutto believed that it would make the constitution a joke. He was happy that PNA leaders were fighting among themselves. The boat seemed to be capsizing within sight of the coast. Those who had laid down their lives to restore the sanctity of the ballot box had actually paved way for another martial law because the selfishness and short-sightedness of a few leaders on both sides were leading the country there.
I was with Sahibzada Farooq Ali, the Speaker of the National Assembly, in the afternoon of July 4 when Arshad Chaudhri came rushing with the information that martial law would be imposed that night. What could be done? It was too late but there was a fighting chance. He rushed to the home of Col. Tasaddaq where a press conference was to be addressed by all PNA leaders to dispel an impression of dissension. Arshad Chaudhri called Nawabzada outside and informed him of the latest development. Arshad requested him to address the conference himself to make the accord public immediately, even if others did not agree. Nasrulla Khan did that but it was too late. His announcement that accord had been reached did not appear in the next morning’s newspapers.
All efforts to save the democratic system ultimately failed. The army moved in during the night and arrested all major leaders of both sides. The martial law was imposed on the night of July 5. Gen. Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, Chief of Army Staff, became the Chief Martial Law Administrator. Zia, which literally means “light,” brought another dawn of darkness and another—much longer—night of the generals.
Raj kare-ga Khalsa. The mood of the people changed overnight. Most of those who had been opposing Bhutto and PPP suddenly turned their ire against the martial law as the pain of the earlier regimes had not yet been forgotten. Gen. Zia, while intending the very opposite, had given a new political life to the dying PPP as there was a sudden sentimental surge in favour of Bhutto and his party. Gen. Zia was shocked on the reaction of the people, as Maj. Gen. Abdur Rahman told me. He was looking into the womanizing episodes of Rao Rashid. “Some women of taste did like Rao Rashid for his being handsome and manly,” I told Gen. Rahman. “Why should CMLA bother about that? He had better worry about the public mood.”
I also told A.R. Shefta, a close friend of Gen. Zia, about the public rejection of martial law. Shefta later told me that the General had decided to revive democracy and hold elections shortly but was worried about the outcome.
“Tell him not to worry,” I assured him. “PNA will secure a majority.”
“But the General’s worry is that PNA will fall apart and Bhutto would be back in power.”
“Politically strong Bhutto will keep the PNA united,” I said. “The General should not worry on that score.”
“Why don’t they merge into one party?” Shefta expressed the General’s wish.
“That is difficult as every party has its background, history and programme,” I explained. “They were united as an alliance only on a minimum programme. You should not expect PNA to become a single party. They will, however, remain united against Bhutto. The regime should go ahead with the elections on October 18 as already announced.”
“No elections in that case. No question of it.” He spoke with an air of finality, sitting in his suite in the Lahore Inter-Continental Hotel. “Why should the General get shoe-beating from Bhutto for the sake of these rag tag politicians and mullas if they cannot get together.” He seemed to be fully aware of the General’s thinking.
I was silent and looked out of the window. It was August 8. A multitude of poor people was walking to the airport to receive Bhutto, who was coming to Lahore for the first time after his dismissal. Shefta also watched them. The lines went on, unbroken.
“I don’t agree with your assessment, Sardar Sahib,” Shefta broke the silence. “Bhutto will win and destroy my friend Zia.” He was still looking at the unending stream of people on the Mall outside. I did not say anything. Fear is very difficult to shake off, especially for the people who walk in the corridors of power.
During our evening walk, I told A/Hameed about my conversation with Shefta.
“There will be no elections on October 18,” he said. “PPP and PNA will have to join hands if they want to dislodge the General.”
I could not believe my ears. In fact, I became annoyed with him. “The General has given a public commitment,” I protested. “How could he go back on that? It would be the worst example of public bad faith.”
A/Hameed said, “That is what will happen. You will see that raj kare-ga Khalsa, baqi rahe na ko. Only the Generals will rule.”
They started the game very soon. Begum Nasim Wali Khan had been one of the vociferous supporters of martial law to throw out Bhutto rather than have an agreement with him. So, one of the earliest steps of the new regime was to release Wali Khan and other NAP leaders. As a quid pro quo, Wali Khan demanded accountability of the Bhutto government before elections were held, under the slogan of Pehle ihtesab, phir intekhab (first accountability, then elections). His demand was supported also by some other PNA leaders, who were in favour of martial law. This demand was later used as one of the main justifications to postpone elections.
While in Makkah on his umra visit, Gen. Zia announced his “determined resolve” to hold elections on schedule. And while in Tehran on his way back, he observed that the politicians “will follow me on my whistle.” The statement was resented but various politicians did follow him.
The elections were postponed because Bhutto had re-emerged as the most popular personality in the backdrop of martial law while in a democratic process and struggle he had lost his popular appeal. The people rejected him as a high-handed ruler but preferred even his tough tactics over martial law.
A/Hameed felt that Bhutto without power would grow in public esteem. The image of a persecuting and bullying Bhutto would be replaced by that of a suffering and struggling leader. Martial law would revive him as a hero who reconstructed the country after a humiliating defeat, got back the occupied territories, brought back the POWs and hosted the first and the only Islamic Summit in which every single member was represented. Now that he had lost his teeth that he used to bite indiscriminately, his sins of maladministration and high-handedness would be forgotten and forgiven.